• January 20, 2022

This Is How Adam Schiff Faked The Meadows/Jordan Texts!

If you haven’t met a notorious liar in your entire life, then it’s my pleasure to introduce Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) who has been lying to us the whole time. He’s not just an ordinary liar, he’s a serial liar.

In fact, even his own Democratic cult knows he’s a liar so he made him a Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.

On Wednesday,  the Jan. 6 Committee admitted that they doctored a text message between Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and former Trump White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows which they presented as evidence against the two at a hearing.

Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and his staff admittedly doctored a text from Jordan to Meadows, many reports confirmed.

As we can remember, way back in 2019, Rep. Adam Schiff, doctored a transcript of a telephone call between President Trump and Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky to use as key evidence in their second fake witch hunt against President Trump. It all happens during the bogus impeachment hearings against President Trump.

After he was caught totally fabricating the transcript, Schiff shrugged off his disgusting attempt to discredit the President of the United States by pretending the transcript he tried to pass off as a legitimate conversation between President Trump and Ukrain President Zelenskyy, at Trump’s first fake impeachment hearing was simply satire.

According to The Federalist reports:

Oops, he did it again. After leaking fake Donald Trump, Jr. emails, fabricating the transcript of a 2019 phone call between former President Donald Trump and Ukraine’s president, and lying about his interactions with the so-called whistleblower behind House Democrats’ first impeachment of Trump, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., is now running the same con against a fellow lawmaker. During a hearing, Monday night on the riot at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, Adam Schiff claimed to have proof that a member of Congress texted former White House chief of staff, Mark Meadows, to instruct former Vice President Mike Pence to overturn the 2020 presidential election results.

Not only did Schiff misrepresent the substance of the text message and its source, he even doctored original text messages, which were obtained and reviewed by The Federalist in their entirety.

Watch it here: The Federalist/Youtube

“I want to display just a few of the message[s] he received from people in Congress,” Schiff said, referring to Meadows. “The committee is not naming these lawmakers at this time as our investigation is ongoing. If we could cue the first graphic.”

The following graphic, purportedly of the text message between a member of Congress and Meadows, then appeared on-screen at Schiff’s direction:

“This one reads, ‘On January 6, 2021, Vice President Mike Pence, as President of the Senate, should call out all electoral votes that he believes are unconstitutional as no electoral votes at all,’” Schiff continued. “You can see why this is so critical to ask Mr. Meadows about. About a lawmaker suggesting that the former vice president simply throw out votes that he unilaterally deems unconstitutional in order to overturn a presidential election and subvert the will of the American people.”

The outlet continues:

Not only did Schiff lie about the substance of the text message and its source, he even doctored the message and graphic that he displayed on-screen during his statement. The full-text message, which was forwarded to Meadows from Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, on the evening of Monday, Jan. 5, was significantly longer than what Schiff read and put on screen, but Schiff erased significant portions of the text and added punctuation where there was none to give the impression that Jordan himself was tersely directing Meadows to give orders to Pence on how to handle the electoral vote certification.

The original text was written by Washington attorney and former Department of Defense Inspector General Joseph Schmitz and included an attachment of a four-page draft Word document drafted by Schmitz that detailed Schmitz’s legal reasoning for suggesting that Pence had the constitutional authority to object to the certification of electoral votes submitted by a handful of states. The piece that Schmitz had sent to Jordan was published at the website everylegal.vote the next day and even included the same “DISCUSSION DRAFT” heading and timestamp on the document that Schmitz sent to Jordan.

Read more of this report from 100percentfedup

Sources: 100percentfedup, The Federalist

The Daily Allegiant