What happened on January 6, was a shock to everyone.
A peaceful rally that turned into a nightmare and has left more questions than answered.
However, as time has crawled on, we have learned certain things that are not adding up or making sense.
So many people who were at the rally have said over and over again, that the rally was infiltrated by Antifa. Of course, the mainstream media has pushed that under the rug saying that wasn’t the case, but that hasn’t stopped us all from still believing it.
Six months after the event, a newly released video suggests that it was indeed Antifa who FIRST broke into the Capitol and not Trump supporters.
Check this video out:
Pay Attention đđŒpic.twitter.com/FVsB6Du6r5
— á. ááOTT áIáá©áIO 2.0 (@SicarioScott) June 8, 2021
Ok, you are asking yourself right now…how does that prove it was Antifa?
Notice how everyone comes in at first is dress in all black.
This tells you two things:
- This was coordinated.
- They are following the Antifa dress code.
Let’s be real for a moment. If this truly was an organic uprising spurned by Trump’s words, wouldn’t there be a whole throng of people rushing into the building wearing all sorts of different types of clothing?
If you think about it, wouldn’t there be mass chaos as they burst through the door?
If it was Trump who incited this entire ordeal, wouldn’t mean that the actions were unplanned?
And if the actions were unplanned, then the actions were also uncoordinated.
Now, there is another theory floating around that Tucker Carlson even reported on during his Tuesday broadcast.
Did the FBI have agents on the inside during the Jan. 6 Capitol incursion? Tucker Carlson believes thereâs evidence that they did â and they may have played a much bigger role than some of those who have been indicted.
Here is more from Western Journal:
On his Tuesday show on Fox News, Carlson argued that the fact that some of the unindicted co-conspirators in the Capitol riot were organizers who were far more involved in any plotting than individuals who were charged led him to believe those individuals were federal agents working on the inside.
At the top of the segment, Carlson noted that Attorney General Merrick Garland, speaking Wednesday, said that âthe top domestic violent extremist threat comes from racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists, specifically those who advocated for the superiority of the white race.â And yet, as the Fox News host also noted, his speech dealt largely with the events of Jan. 6.
âHe, like most people you see on television, wants you to believe, and wants history to record, that Jan. 6 was an attempted insurrection by white supremacist revolutionaries bent on taking over this country,â Carlson said. âWe came this close, Merrick Garland said. And thatâs why âWe must adopt a broader societal response to tackle the problemâs deeper roots.’â
He said this was âa big change in the way the U.S. government assesses and then treats its own citizens,â a slide toward authoritarianism Carlson saw in how Jan. 6 is being treated.
We donât, for instance, know who shot Ashli Babbitt, the woman who was killed during the incursion. We still havenât seen what Carlson said was âmore than 10,000 hours of surveillance tape from the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6.â
Perhaps most importantly, he said, we donât know who Person Two or Person Three are.
Carlson was referencing a report from Revolver.news, a right-wing website and aggregator that looked at some of the Department of Justiceâs indictments in the wake of the Capitol incursion. There are quite a few unindicted co-conspirators who appear to be known to law enforcement but havenât been charged or named.
There could be a number of reasons for this, but Carlson seems to believe one reason in particular.
âWithout fail, the government has thrown the book at most people who were present in the Capitol on Jan. 6,â he said. âThere was a nationwide dragnet to find them. And many of them are still in solitary confinement tonight.
âBut, strangely, some of the key people who participated on Jan. 6 have not been charged. Look at the documents. The government calls those people âunindicted co-conspirators.â What does that mean?
âWell, it means that in potentially every single case, they were FBI operatives.â
His argument stems from those pesky individuals identified only as Person Two and Person Three, both unindicted co-conspirators in the Jan. 6Â Capitol incursion.
âAccording to those documents,â Carlson said, âPerson Two stayed in the same hotel room as a man called Thomas Caldwell â an âinsurrectionist,â a man alleged to be a member of the group the Oath Keepers. Person Two also âstormed the barricadesâ at the Capitol on Jan. 6 alongside Thomas Caldwell.
âThe governmentâs indictments further indicate that Caldwell â who by the way is a 65-year-old man, this dangerous insurrectionist â was led to believe there would be a âquick reaction forceâ also participating on Jan. 6. That quick reaction force, Caldwell was told, would be led by someone called âPerson Threeâ â who had a hotel room and an accomplice with him..
âBut wait. Hereâs the interesting thing. Person Two and Person Three were organizers of the riot. The government knows who they are, but the government has not charged them.
âWhy is that? You know why. They were almost certainly working for the FBI. So FBI operatives were organizing the attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6, according to government documents. And those two are not alone.â
Overall, Revolver.news analyzed the indictments and found âupwards of 20 unindicted co-conspirators in the Oath Keeper indictments, all playing various roles in the conspiracy, who have not been charged for virtually the exact same activities â and in some cases much, much more severe activities â as those named alongside them in indictments.â
You know the Carl Sagan quote: âExtraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.â The thing is, FBI infiltration in situations like these isnât necessarily extraordinary.
âRemember that plot to kidnap [Michigan] Gov. Gretchen Whitmer? We heard a lot about that, and Whitmer was able to cover some of her own incompetence, although not all, by pointing to the fact that sheâs now a victim,â Carlson said. âNow, in the FBIâs telling of that plot, a whole team of insurrectionists was going to drive a van up to Gretchen Whitmerâs vacation house and throw her in the back and drive away.
âThe mastermind of this plot, according to the FBI, was a man called Adam Fox. Who was Adam Fox? Adam Fox turned out to be a homeless guy who was living in the basement of a vacuum repair shop. Quite a guerrilla!â
Carlson said that âif you read the governmentâs charging documents carefully, and you should, youâll see that it gets even more ridiculous. It turns out that one of the five people in the planned âGretchen Whitmer kidnap vanâ was an FBI agent. In the van. Another was an FBI informant. And the feds admitted in these documents that an informant or undercover agent was âusually presentâ in the groupâs meetings.
âIn other words ⊠nearly half the gang of kidnappers were working for the FBI. Remember the guy who suggested using a bomb to blow up a bridge as part of that plot? That got a lot of coverage. That guy was an undercover FBI agent.â
When the alleged Whitmer kidnap plot members were indicted, socialist publication Jacobin noted the case bore similarities to other examples of near-entrapment by the FBI, including Islamists. They described the case of âtwenty-five-year-old Robert Lorenzo Hester Jr, indicted in 2017 for planning to bomb a Kansas City train station, in a plot whose every detail â time, place, and type of attack â was devised by his two ISIS-member accomplices. Unfortunately for Hester, those ISIS members turned out to be undercover FBI agents who had contacted Hester to devise the plot after seeing some of his extremist social media posts.
âLike Shareef, Hester was poor; at one meeting with what he thought were ISIS agents, he brought his kids because he didnât have childcare. And like Shareef, the FBI not only provided him weapons and gave him the list of bomb-making supplies he needed to buy, but they gave him the $20 he needed to afford them, with Hester later promising the agents he would buy ammunition once he got his tax refund. At one point, an agent threatened Hester with a knife and reminded him that he knew where his family lived. This year, Hester was sentenced to nineteen years in prison.â
These things have gone wrong before, too. Before a terrorist attacked a contest to draw a caricature of the Prophet Muhammad in Garland, Texas, in 2015, an FBI agent working undercover to infiltrate Islamist terrorists texted the shooter and instructed him to âtear up Texas.â
Carlson argued it went farther, using author Trevor Aaronsonâs 2013 book âThe Terror Factory: Inside the FBIâs Manufactured War on Terrorism.â
âHe analyzed every terrorism prosecution from 2001 to 2013,â the Fox News host said. âAaronson found that at least 50 defendants were on trial because of behavior that the FBI had not only encouraged but enabled. FBI agents were essentially the plotters in these crimes. They made the crimes, crimes.â
Carlsonâs overarching point can best be encapsulated at 11:30: âIf you empower the government to violate civil liberties in pursuit of a foreign terror organization, and there are foreign terror organizations, itâs just a matter of time before ambitious politicians use those same mechanisms to suppress political dissent.â
Not sure about you, but I do believe that Tucker is onto something here and considering the FBI’s shady past, it is not beanth them at all.
Share you thoughts below!
Leave a Comment