Wow, The Jan 6 Committee Just Blew Their Whole Argument Up…
And all of a sudden, they have just accidentally ratted themselves out.
The January 6 incident has just defamed the FBI and everything it stands for.
As the so-called investigation moves forward each day, more and more pieces of evidence prove that the riot at the Capitol was plotted but they are doing their best to blame the whole thing on Trump and his supporters.
The most iconic rat is Ray Epps whom the agency keeps on protecting from claims that he is a Federal informant, his removal from the most wanted lists, and claiming that this guy is a law-abiding citizen. Really?
But shreds of evidence cannot tamper especially when it’s posted online.
The January 6 Committee’s entire purpose is to argue that Trump and his allies “incited” a riot with their rhetoric. Yet, with one man who seemed to have actually helped incite the riot with his words, the entire committee comes out to defend him as a law-abiding citizen.
— Scott Greer 6’2” IQ 187 (@ScottMGreer) January 12, 2022
And Tucker Carlson calling out Adam Kinzinger as a liar is just a complete fact.
Tucker Carlson Calls Out @AdamKinzinger For His Bizarre Statements On Ray Epps And Challenges Kinzinger To Come On His Show
“Adam Kinzinger is lying.”
“Kinzinger is withholding critical information from the public.”pic.twitter.com/BFbgEo2hS7
— The Columbia Bugle (@ColumbiaBugle) January 13, 2022
And watch how Assistant FBI Director responds to Cruz’s questions.
Watch it here: Youtube/Forbes Breaking News
Trending Politics highlights a segment from Tucker Carlson on Epps and the F.B.I:
“Did you hear that? Cruz asked, ‘Did any FBI agents or confidential informants, crimes of violence on January 6th?’ That’s what he asked. The obvious answer is are you kidding? ‘Of course, the FBI isn’t secretly committing crimes of violence, that’s insane, we’re a federal law enforcement agency, not the Tonton Macoute. Next question, please.’
That’s what she should have said, but that’s not what she said. Instead, she replied, ‘I can’t answer that.’ But of course, Jill Sanborn can answer that and she should be forced to answer that immediately. ‘No sources and methods can be revealed.’ Just answer the question. Did they participate in violence or not, why is that hard?”
This whole plot is just coming down to one conclusion, somebody is trying to make somebody bad.
The Epoch Times reported:
“initially unable to reach Epps for comment, he responded to a text message later on the night of Jan. 11.
“Please refer any questions to our attorney John Blischak,” Epps wrote. “He will be happy to answer your questions, as I’ve been advised not to talk to anyone at this time.”
When reached by phone the next morning, Blischak vigorously denied that Epps is a federal informant.”
This had been so entertaining…
Sources: We Love Trump, The Epoch Times